在线咨询
eetop公众号 创芯大讲堂 创芯人才网
切换到宽版

EETOP 创芯网论坛 (原名:电子顶级开发网)

手机号码,快捷登录

手机号码,快捷登录

找回密码

  登录   注册  

快捷导航
搜帖子
查看: 3415|回复: 3

[求助] fanout violation when synthesis.

[复制链接]
发表于 2011-8-30 18:22:20 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册

x
Hi,

suppose the given case:

the external system reset port rst_n is a high-fanout-net, however, when doing synthesis, using the constraints below

(1) I don't set_ideal_network attributes on rst_n, letting DC build the buffer tree.
(2) set_max_fanout 30 [get_ports rst_n]

when report_constraint -all_violators -max_fanout, violations occur on the port rst_n, showing a negtive slack.

Why doesn't this happen, and how do I fix the violation if I fix this during synthesis( not when implementating the layout).

Thanks in advance.
发表于 2011-8-30 22:56:46 | 显示全部楼层
did you set driven cell on rst_n?
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-30 23:19:22 | 显示全部楼层
回复 2# 陈涛


    No driven cell is set.

Now I think it's violated by the tight max_fanout constraint. I checked the library and found that the max_fanout of the output_pin of the
rst_n PAD is 600. In this case the slack is 600 - 150 = 450, which is a positive slack.And I could ignore this violation by remove the tight max_fanout constraint, or loosen the constraint.

Is this right?

Thanks in advance.
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-30 23:44:47 | 显示全部楼层
回复 2# 陈涛

No driving cell is set.

I checked the library and found that the output pins of the rst_n PAD has a max_fanout attribute of 600, In this case, the slack would be
600 - 160 > 0, which is a positive slack.
and I could remove the tight max_fanout constraint or loosen the constraint to get a no-violations result, right?

yeah?

thanks in advance.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐 上一条 /1 下一条

小黑屋| 手机版| 关于我们| 联系我们| 隐私声明| EETOP 创芯网
( 京ICP备:10050787号 京公网安备:11010502037710 )

GMT+8, 2025-5-16 03:46 , Processed in 0.016949 second(s), 7 queries , Gzip On, MemCached On.

eetop公众号 创芯大讲堂 创芯人才网
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表