在线咨询
eetop公众号 创芯大讲堂 创芯人才网
切换到宽版

EETOP 创芯网论坛 (原名:电子顶级开发网)

手机号码,快捷登录

手机号码,快捷登录

找回密码

  登录   注册  

快捷导航
搜帖子
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: sanxingstar

[求助] 求助:为什么我的calibre的RCX分析总是报错?

[复制链接]
发表于 2012-11-1 21:13:18 | 显示全部楼层
不错不错,很有用呀
发表于 2015-9-24 09:21:07 | 显示全部楼层
这个问题以前有人在mentor社区里问过,以下时mentor方面给的解答:
Hi,

You should only use LAYOUT CASE or SOURCE CASE YES if netlist object names that differ *only by text case* are, in fact, different objects. So, for example, if vdd and VDD are truly different nets, then you have to treat that netlist with case-sensitive parsing by setting the proper command to YES. If you have no objects that are logically different based on text case alone, then both of the preceding commands should be set to NO, which is the default.

Case-sensitive comparison of layout to source is a different matter. Calibre doesn't compare layout to source in a case-sensitive manner unless you say LVS COMPARE CASE YES. If that is set, then vdd in layout will not match VDD in the source. If NO (default) is set, then they will match.

Do this:

grep -i "lvs compare case" lvs_report

If the setting is YES, you may want to set that to NO. If it already is NO, then it sounds like your nets that differ by case are logically different nets.

For a complete discussion of this topic, refer to "Case-Sensitive Handling of Netlists" in the Calibre Verification User's Manual.

dan
发表于 2017-4-7 01:19:48 | 显示全部楼层
谢谢了,也遇到这个问题了,帮助很大。
发表于 2020-7-3 14:11:00 | 显示全部楼层


cocoqoo 发表于 2015-9-24 09:21
这个问题以前有人在mentor社区里问过,以下时mentor方面给的解答:
Hi,


我也碰到了这个问题。按照这个方法解决了。多谢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐 上一条 /2 下一条


小黑屋| 手机版| 关于我们| 联系我们| 在线咨询| 隐私声明| EETOP 创芯网
( 京ICP备:10050787号 京公网安备:11010502037710 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-23 03:11 , Processed in 0.014478 second(s), 6 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

eetop公众号 创芯大讲堂 创芯人才网
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表