在线咨询 切换到宽版
eetop公众号 创芯大讲堂 创芯人才网

 找回密码
 注册

手机号码,快捷登录

手机号码,快捷登录

搜全文
查看: 8819|回复: 11

[求助] sigma-delta调制器中奇次项谐波的消除

[复制链接]
发表于 2013-5-16 20:36:03 | 显示全部楼层
回复 1# violet516


    First of all, you should know which part cause the odd-order distortion, OTA or DAC ?
    The output DR of OTA is enough ? The input amp of your OTA is small ? GBW is large enough ?
    If you use CIFF topology, the design of your summing block is good ?
    The ELD compensation's timing is correct ?
    4-bit will have a very high requirement on your DAC. The timing, overshoot, DWA.........
回复 支持 1 反对 0

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-5-16 20:54:07 | 显示全部楼层
回复 1# violet516


    In addition, is your system level design is correct ? I found that some guys use z-domain model to simulation CT-DSM, that will cause a prolem. And your solver in simulink should be ode15s or 23s, not ode45, ode45 is for DT-DSM.
回复 支持 1 反对 0

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-5-16 22:52:07 | 显示全部楼层
回复 4# mcgrady


    ode45 is non-stiff solver. CT-DSM is stiff, ode23s and ode15s are stiff solvers. they are better.
    You can use ode45, but you should use it carefully.
回复 支持 1 反对 0

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-5-18 04:27:54 | 显示全部楼层
回复 7# vdslafe


    I forget the answer to the first question. I saw it in a PhD thesis, it says it's stiff.
   
    Use ode45 is not efficient and may cause inaccurate instability.
    In spectre, if you use "conservative", it's gear2only
    ode15s use grear method, it use more equations in one step, but less steps than ode45, so it's more efficient
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐 上一条 /1 下一条

X

手机版| 小黑屋| 关于我们| 联系我们| 隐私声明| EETOP 创芯网
( 京ICP备:10050787号 京公网安备:11010502037710 )

GMT+8, 2025-9-15 03:21 , Processed in 0.011975 second(s), 4 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

eetop公众号 创芯大讲堂 创芯人才网
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表