|
发表于 2009-2-27 20:19:45
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 ddrr 于 2009-2-27 19:22 发表
waiting on line...
建议楼主把Vo ripple and inductor current 的时域图贴上来。
我第一次的回复不太严谨。
我的想法是:
At steay state, taking a look with a long peirod, the effective duty cycle of converter should be D_eff = Vo/Vdd (when operate at CCM).
Thus the input clock duty cycle gives us the upper range of D_eff, or (D_eff)max = D_clk.
At light load, the coverter operates in DCM and D_eff is smaller than Vo/Vdd.
When load arises, D_eff is accordingly larger, the D_eff will be euqal to Vo/Vdd when the converter operates at CCM.
Once converter enters CCM, D_eff should not change in ideal case.
Practically D_eff needs to be larger than Vo/Vdd to compensate the parasitical loss.
Thus, the duty cycle of clock should be larger than Vref/Vdd when we use this topology.
As to your case, when load is light, the converter operates at DCM , therefore, you can get the Vo = 14.4.
While at heavy load, when converter operates at CCM, you can not get a Vo larger than Vdd*D_clk. |
|