只有仿真结果，能发好期刊吗

majpliush

是不是好期刊一定要流片测试呢

zouliang1127

TCAS I &II, VLSI doesn't necessarily require a real tape-out result.
If you do have some excellent theories, JSSC also welcomes your paper.

JoyShockley

JSSC 是不可能的。
如果是电路结构创新，TCAS-I 或者II 也几乎不可能。

如果是理论创新，TCAS-I 或者II 可能，但你的理论功底得非常强。

VAEEE

JoyShockley 发表于 2020-4-23 01:12
JSSC 是不可能的。
如果是电路结构创新，TCAS-I 或者II 也几乎不可能。

像欧固、亚固这样的会议呢？？

zouliang1127

JoyShockley 发表于 2020-4-23 01:12
JSSC 是不可能的。
如果是电路结构创新，TCAS-I 或者II 也几乎不可能。

“A General Theory of Phase Noise in Electrical Oscillators“ Ali Hajimiri, Student Member, IEEE , and Thomas H. Lee, Member, IEEE

”The Quadrature LC Oscillator: A Complete Portrait Based on Injection Locking“ Ahmad Mirzaei, Mohammad E. Heidari, Rahim Bagheri, Saeed Chehrazi, and Asad A. Abidi, Fellow, IEEE
“Multi-Phase Injection Widens Lock Range of Ring-Oscillator-Based Frequency Dividers” Ahmad Mirzaei, Mohammad E. Heidari, Rahim Bagheri, Student Member, IEEE, and Asad A. Abidi, Fellow, IEEE

What about these papers? All from JSSC, if you do a good search, you can get much more.

zouliang1127

Also, many of the times, TCAS II accepts patches from the mainstream theories !

acging

zouliang1127 发表于 2020-4-23 12:56
“A General Theory of Phase Noise in Electrical Oscillators“ Ali Hajimiri, Student Member, IEEE , ...

第一篇算是phase noise最经典的论文了，但也是有测试结果的。

zouliang1127

That's the skill, or to say the mandatory format, of writing papers. The purposes for those famous authors want only to publish their theories!

zouliang1127

acging 发表于 2020-4-23 13:33
第一篇算是phase noise最经典的论文了，但也是有测试结果的。

BTW, ISF concept is popular and widely accepted in the community, however, the theory is not actually thoroughly correct.

Since the LTV based PN theories were overwhelmed by the nonlinear-TV ones in the same time period. But theses more accurate results were published in TCAS I.

quantus

中不中首先看创新性，另外还与审稿人的风格有关系，被拒了换个期刊投就是了，多投总是能中的。
理论上的大创新加上大牛加持jssc也是有可能的，比如5楼举的例子。不过现在约稿的多。
结构上的创新没有测试结果，别说审稿人了，我自己投的时候都觉得心虚。当然即使有测试结果审稿人也会问得很细，比如他们会问你的片子是用啥仪器测的。
当然审稿人也不是神了，也有只是流了片没测出来，但是谎称自己测了的结果发表了的，比如tvlsi上就有几篇。这种学术不端就不能去看齐了。
话说最近几年发jssc"其实"没那么难了，毕竟现在都有钱流片了，流得多了，大家又都很有兴趣写，中的也就多了，不过真的大牛已经开始发自然和pans。