|
发表于 2012-8-10 17:19:48
|
显示全部楼层
回复 23# austxuhui
Since I do not know your M1, M2, R sizes and models I wanted to speed you up to a good enough point in your simulations. There is no magic about 8.3uA current, I got it from your simulation result curves shown at your post number 14. On your plot with your existing M1, M2 and R values, 8.3uA is giving you aproximately v(A)=v(B) (Eye-balling from your plot I got 8.3uA, so it is aproximate). Now if you like the results while still watching v(A)=v(B) you can change current value provided that you keep current density through M1 and M2 the same i.e. change current and device sizes together so you have same current density on CMOS transistors. If you satisfied with your new nominal current value, device sizes and results than check VDsat=Vgs-Vt of transistors and make sure VDsat is about 200mV for better matching results (If you go closer to weak inversion i.e. 70-100mv of VDsat your mirror error will be worse since Vgs mismatch dominates). I realize Google translation is not as clear as it should be, I do not have any other way, but you understood so it worked. Good luck.
既然我不知道你的M1,M2,研究尺寸和型号,我想加快你在你的模拟足够的好点。有没有约8.3uA电流的魔力,我从你的仿真结果曲线显示在您的后14号。在您与您现有的M1,M2和R值的情节,8.3uA给你aproximately至五 V(A)= V(B)(从你的阴谋眼球我8.3uA,因此它是aproximate)。现在,如果你喜欢的结果,而仍然看至五 V(A)= V(B)你可以改变电流值提供您保留通过M1和M2相同的,即电流变化和器件尺寸在一起让你有相同的电流密度的CMOS电流密度晶体管。如果您满意您的新的额定电流值,器件尺寸和比支票VDSAT= VGS-VT晶体管的结果,使确保VDSAT是为更好的匹配结果约200mV的(如果你去接近弱反转,即70-100mv的VDSAT你的镜子错误会更糟,因为VGS不匹配占主导地位)。我知道谷歌翻译是因为它应该是不清晰的,我没有任何其他方式,但你了解它的工作。祝你好运。 |
|